RECALLING
THE WRONG BOARD
QUESTION: A recall petition
was
circulated against the existing board. Before the date of the recall
there was
an annual meeting and a new board with new directors was elected. The
leaders of the recall insist
their petition is still valid against the new board.
ANSWER:
The recall petition is no
longer valid; it became moot with the election of a new
board. The old board that petitioners sought to remove is no longer in
existence. If they want to recall the new board, they need to circulate a
new
petition.
LIABILITY FOR
SEISMIC
GAS VALVE?
QUESTION:
Our association looked into installing seismic gas shut-off
valves but the board is concerned that they may
have liability in the event there is an earthquake and the valves fail.
They don't want to open themselves to liability
unnecessarily. Is this a valid concern?
ANSWER: A
seismic valve automatically shuts off natural gas to a building when an
earthquake of a sufficient magnitude occurs. Turning off the gas greatly
reduces
the risk of explosions and fires after a major earthquake. They are so
effective
that (i) some insurance companies will reduce the cost of insurance if
they are
installed and (ii) some cities require shut-off valves on all new
construction
and any remodeling valued at $10,000 or more.
RECOMMENDATION:
Not installing seismic valves because they might fail is a
poor argument against safety equipment.
The potential damage from explosions and fire is much greater than the
potential
liability from a failure. With all the recent earthquake activity around
the world, the more prudent course of action is to install the
valves.
FORECLOSURE
RIGHT OF REDEMPTION
QUESTION: My association
foreclosed on a
delinquent unit. Since no one bid at the foreclosure sale, the
association now
owns the unit. How does the right of redemption affect us? How do we get
the old
owner out?
ANSWER:
The association’s right to the property is subject to the
foreclosed owner’s
90-day right of redemption.
Code of Civil Proc. §729.035. The redemption period allows the
foreclosed
owner to "redeem" the property by paying the delinquent amounts plus any
collection fees and costs in that 90-day period.
Holding Period. Because
title does not
transfer until after the 90-days, the trustee records a "certificate of
sale,"
which gives notice of the association's right to the property but does
not
transfer ownership. As a result, the association cannot evict the owner
from the
property during the redemption period. This gives the foreclosed owner
an
additional 90-day free ride to live in the unit without paying any
monies to the
association.
Right
to Evict. After the 90
days, the trustee records title in the association's name,
thereby transferring ownership and possession rights to the association.
Once
that happens, the association can file an unlawful detainer action to
evict the
foreclosed owner from the property. -Tina
Wang, Esq.
HOLDING
RAFFLES
TO MAKE QUORUM
QUESTION:
To achieve quorum at its annual meeting, can an association hold a
raffle? Can
we give away one month's dues? If this
can be done, do we write a check to the owner or
simply credit the owner's account?
ANSWER:
Yes, you can hold a raffle. There is nothing illegal or
improper with raffling
off one month of free dues. It can be done by crediting the owner's
account.
Some associations get local vendors to donate free dinners to
restaurants, free
car washes, gift baskets, etc.
SPECIAL
ELECTION
UNNECESSARY
QUESTION: One of our
directors recently resigned. The
remaining directors want to wait until the upcoming annual meeting to
fill the vacancy. We have
a member insisting that we immediately start the election process to
replace the
resigning director. Can we save the association some money and wait
until the
annual meeting?
ANSWER:
Most governing documents allow the board to appoint someone to fill the
empty seat as provided for in
Corp. Code §7224(a). Occasionally I run
across documents that require a special election. If yours requires an
election,
it depends on the timing. If your annual meeting is only months away, it
makes
no economic sense to hold two elections in rapid succession--a special
election
quickly followed by the annual meeting. You should wait for the annual
meeting.
You should also consider amending your documents to get rid of the
special
election requirement.