|
BOARD MISMANAGEMENT
QUESTION: We get minutes from past
meetings some 6 months later, reports by CPAs are inconclusive as they clearly
state improper and inadequate information. Delinquent assessments are not being
pursued. Our funds are mostly unaccounted for or miserably spent. How can we get
the board to follow the rules of conducting our business?
ANSWER:
You have four options. The first is political--actively campaign to elect responsible directors.
If you run into paralyzing apathy from the membership, you have a legal
option--go to court and seek an order forcing the board to follow its statutory
obligations. Unfortunately, the legal option has no guarantees and can be costly. Your third
choice is to live with the mismanagement. However, this could result in large special assessments when the board's
negligence catches up with everyone. The fourth option is to sell and get out
before the poo hits the fan.
WHEN IS A
MEETING A MEETING?
QUESTION: I have been told that if a
majority of the board is at a meeting called for some other purpose, such as a discussion group or advisory committee, that this is an
illegal board meeting. This seems prohibitive. Just being in attendance, it seems to me, is
not a board meeting. Could you clarify?
ANSWER: Directors are not prohibited from attending
barbeques, birthday parties or committee meetings, unless a majority of the directors "hear, discuss, or
deliberate upon any item of business scheduled to be heard by the board."
Civil Code §1363.05(j)
If the matters discussed in a committee meeting are not scheduled to be
heard by the board, a majority of directors can attend and participate. It's entirely
possible the committee's discussions will result in recommendations that will
ultimately be scheduled to be heard by the board. This appears to be permissible. For
example, directors attend a landscape committee meeting where the removal of a
tree is discussed by the committee. This matter has not been scheduled for board
action but may be added to the agenda after further research by the committee.
Even so, the safest course of action is to give notice of committee meetings
whenever a majority of directors plan to attend. That way, you avoid any
controversy.
QUORUM
PROBLEMS
QUESTION: I have an HOA that has not
amended their voting rules. They have had 2 meetings to open ballots but still
do not have a quorum. We are on the 3rd meeting and still no quorum. What's
next?
ANSWER:
The board can (i) continue rescheduling meetings until they get a quorum, or
(ii)
go into court and ask the court to lower the quorum requirement for this
election to the number of votes cast, or (iii) end their attempts at meeting quorum, leave the existing board in place and pour their energies into amending
the bylaws to end quorum requirements for the election of directors. I recommend
amending your bylaws; it’s the only option that makes sense.
CC&R AMENDMENTS
AND CALIFORNIA
QUESTION:
I thought the CC&Rs were a California state document. If we were to change
something, doesn't the state have to amend everyone's CC&Rs? 
ANSWER:
CC&Rs are not "state" documents and the state does not oversee the
amendment process once the developer transfers control to the association. CC&Rs
are unique to each common interest development and are recorded with the County
Recorder's Office. Amendments approved by your membership do not effect the
CC&Rs of any other developments in California. Although
amendments do not require state review, they should be reviewed by your
association's legal counsel. They must then be sent to the membership for
approval using secret ballots. Once an amendment has been approved by your
membership, it becomes effective upon recordation.
ZERO VOTES
FOR A CANDIDATE
QUESTION: What happens if one of the three
candidates (for a three member board) receives 0 votes?
ANSWER:
That person is not elected. The seat remains empty until the new board
appoints someone to fill it. Unless the governing documents state otherwise, the
new board is not required to appoint the loser to the empty seat. The board may
appoint anyone who meets the qualifications to serve on the board.
TREASURER
CONFLICT
QUESTION: We have a board member, the
treasurer, who is working for our management company and is a signer on the
checks. I think this is a major conflict of interest. What do you think?
ANSWER:
It depends on his/her role in the management company. If the treasurer’s work
does not involve anything related to the association, then the potential for
conflict is relatively low. Even so, the treasurer must be recused from all
matters related to the management company's contract. If your treasurer works in
the management company’s billing department depositing monies
for the association, preparing checks for signature, and preparing the
association’s financial statements, then you have significant exposure to
financial loss. The treasurer may be completely honest and nothing may ever
happen but the potential problems are too great to ignore. In that scenario, the
director should immediately step down as treasurer and cease being a signer of
checks.

Very truly yours,

Adrian Adams, Esq.
Adams
Kessler PLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright
Adams Kessler
Professional Law Corporation
Davis-Stirling.com
is not affiliated with or sponsored by any governmental agency. Our
newsletters are for residents of California and are for advertising and
information only. Readers should not act on information in our
newsletters or websites without first consulting legal and insurance
professionals.
You May
Reprint Articles
provided no changes
are made to the article and you
include the following:
Reprinted from
Davis-Stirling.com by Adams Kessler |
|

|
|

Link to

|
|
|

Business Directory for industry specialists |
|
|
|