My mother is 70 years old and has repeatedly asked her HOA to
have a brighter light installed outside her door for safety reasons. The current
light (a recessed one) is dim and she fears she will either trip or something
will happen due to the substandard lighting. She can barely find the keyhole in
her door because of the poor lighting. They told her
they can't alter the aesthetics of her unit and she should have bought a house
if she wanted brighter lighting.
Your board is willing to risk injury to a 70-year-old resident because a
brighter light is not as attractive? I doubt that a jury would agree with your board's decision. First, your board does
have the power alter the aesthetics of your mother's
unit. Second, your directors need to read the California Supreme Court case Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn
where plaintiff installed extra
lighting to protect herself and the board ordered it removed. She was
subsequently raped and robbed.
The court concluded that the resident could bring suit against association and
its directors for failing to take action to avoid harm and contributing to the
risk of injury to residents. The court noted that associations function as landlords in maintaining the common areas and boards
have a duty to exercise due care for their residents' safety in those areas
under the association's control. Your board needs to re-think its position.
: Associations needing legal assistance can contact us
To stay current with issues affecting community associations, subscribe to the Davis-Stirling Newsletter