No Super-Majorities for Remcalls
Adams Stirling PLC
Menu

NO SUPER MAJORITIES FOR RECALLS

The voting requirement for removing directors is set by law and cannot be raised to a super majority by an association's governing documents.

Corporations Code Controls. The Corporations Code specifically overrides any conflicting bylaw provisions. As provided for in Corporations Code §7222(d), "Except as provided for in this section . . . a director may not be removed prior to the expiration of the director's term of office." If you follow the links in Sections 5033 and 5034, they state that the approval requirements for removing a director cannot be increased.

For example, Section 5034 defines "approved by the members" as the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes represented and voting at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present. This same section allows bylaws to set a higher voting threshold EXCEPT for the removal of directors (see Corp. Code §7151(e)). This is reinforced by Corp. Code §7151(c)(2) which states that an association's bylaws may not contain any provision that conflicts with the law.

Legislative Notes.
The legislative notes regarding the removal of directors state that "This subdivision specifies the exclusive procedure for removal of directors without cause" . . . because governing documents that require a "super-majority" improperly limit the rights of shareholders to change the composition of the board between annual meetings.

Unpublished Decision
. In an unpublished decision involving attorneys fees, the court in Autry v. Villa Riviera noted that a provision in the association's bylaws requiring a super majority to recall a director was unenforceable.

ASSISTANCE: Associations needing legal assistance can contact us. To stay current with issues affecting community associations, subscribe to the Davis-Stirling Newsletter.

Adams Stirling PLC